The Sony Camera Conundrum: Fx3 vs. a7S III
Sony’s digital camera lineup has thrown a curveball, leaving filmmakers in a bit of a dilemma. The Sony a7S III, with its stellar features, seemed like a secure choice for many. However, with the recent introduction of the Sony FX3, questions have arisen: Is the FX3 truly better for video? Should a7S III owners consider switching? Let’s dive into this comparison to find out.
Key Differences at a Glance
1. Ergonomics & Design
- Sony a7S III: Traditional Alpha series design, featuring a swivel-and-tilt LCD monitor and a viewfinder, making it a versatile option for both video and still photography.
- Sony FX3: Video-first design with no viewfinder, a fixed swivel monitor, and a top handle with integrated XLR/TRS terminals for professional audio. The FX3 also features thread holes for easy attachment of accessories, turning it into a ready-to-go cage.
2. Audio Capabilities
- Sony a7S III: Comes with a standard 3.5 mm stereo minijack (2-channel) and requires an XLR adapter kit for enhanced audio recording.
- Sony FX3: Equipped with dual XLR/TRS inputs, offering professional audio recording straight out of the box, along with a tally lamp and zoom lever for additional functionality.
3. Cooling & Overheating
- Sony a7S III: Prone to overheating after prolonged recording, particularly at higher frame rates.
- Sony FX3: Features a built-in cooling fan that allows for continuous 4K 60p recording without overheating, giving it a clear edge in longer video shoots.
Performance Breakdown
1. Video Quality & Resolution Both cameras share identical video specifications, including:
- Resolution: 4K up to 120 fps (with a slight crop) and 240 fps in 1080p.
- Dynamic Range: 15 stops.
- ISO Range: 80-102,400.
- RAW and Codec Support: 16-bit RAW, XAVC S-I 4K, XAVC HS 4K.
Whether you choose the a7S III or the FX3, you’ll get outstanding video quality, making it tough to differentiate between the two purely on image output.
2. Autofocus & Image Stabilization Both the a7S III and FX3 excel in autofocus performance and image stabilization:
- Autofocus: Reliable with the same focus aids, including zebra markings and histograms.
- Image Stabilization: 5-axis in-body stabilization. The FX3 offers an additional gyro data feature, but stabilization using this data requires Sony’s Catalyst software.
Practical Considerations
1. Battery Life Both cameras use the same battery, offering nearly identical battery life:
- Sony FX3: 95 minutes
- Sony a7S III: 90 minutes
The 5-minute difference is negligible, so battery life won’t be a deciding factor between these two models.
2. Price Price is always a key consideration:
- Sony FX3: $3,898
- Sony a7S III: $3,498
The FX3 is $400 more expensive than the a7S III. The question is whether the extra features justify this cost.
Final Verdict: Which Camera Is Right for You?
- For Videographers: The FX3 is designed with you in mind, offering built-in XLR inputs, a top handle, and a cooling system that supports continuous shooting without overheating. It’s the ideal choice if your primary focus is on video production.
- For Hybrid Shooters: The a7S III remains a formidable option, especially if you need a camera that can handle both video and still photography with equal finesse. The viewfinder and more traditional design may be more appealing to those who shoot a variety of content.
Sony has certainly made the decision-making process more complex with the introduction of the FX3. While it offers some unique advantages, particularly for professional videographers, the a7S III is still a highly capable and versatile camera. The debate between the FX3 and a7S III ultimately comes down to your specific needs as a filmmaker or photographer.
If you’re still on the fence, remember that either camera will serve you exceptionally well—Sony’s craftsmanship ensures that. And if you’re curious about other options, check out our articles on the best mirrorless cameras and the ongoing debate between mirrorless and DSLR cameras.
